Friday 3 November 2017

New strategies, new action plans, new legislation, new funding and new training.

These are all approaches that are widely used to bring about changes in our education, health and social work systems to improve the lives of those supported by these services. Yet despite the time and resources allocated to these very well-intentioned approaches, do they genuinely achieve the transformational changes we aspire to?

Evidence and experiences teach us that unfortunately they rarely do.

As someone who previously worked on developing new strategies and action plans, it is somewhat dispiriting to look back and accept that these were unlikely on their own to have ever brought about the positive changes that colleagues and I had hoped for.

There is however a silver lining.

Since joining CELCIS I have been exposed to Active Implementation, and I've been encouraged by the emphasis it places on how strategies and action plans should 'come off the page' and actually be delivered.

So what is Active Implementation, and in what ways does it transform our understanding of how to bring about change to public sector systems?

These are big questions that undoubtedly extend beyond a blog. Yet, what I offer here are my reflections on what Active Implementation is and isn't, drawing on my past consultancy experience and my current role within CELCIS' Protecting Children team. This dual perspective provides, I hope, a useful insight for those who are new to and intrigued by Active Implementation.

What Active Implementation Is Not

Flipping the order and beginning with the 'what Active Implementation is not', I feel useful distinctions can be made between Active Implementation and other consultancy work. Key differences of Active Implementation that I have seen are that:

• It is not a short, sharp research exercise where, for example, external consultants come in for 3-4 months, consult with key staff and stakeholders, review the available data, and produce a final report or strategy before moving on to the next research contract.
• The scope of its work cannot be clearly defined up front in a research brief with pre-determined research questions, as the scope only becomes apparent when the current system is explored in depth and key issues identified.
• The end outcome is not the production of a final report or strategy and accompanying recommendations, which organisations are then left with to take forward and implement as best they can.
• It does not revolve around expert external consultants coming in and waving their magic wands, while the existing, internal staff and skills are overlooked.

What Active Implementation is

So if we have a better understanding of what Active Implementation is not, then what is it?

Developed in the United States, Active Implementation provides a framework that helps organisations to respond to all factors, including those that are often overlooked, required to successfully implement an approach. Examples of its use can be found in the implementation of evidence-based programmes and evidence-informed approaches in the fields of child welfare, education and mental health. The University of North Carolina's National Implementation Research Network (NIRN) and its Active Implementation Hub also offer a wide range of publically available resources.

Learning from these and drawing on CELCIS' early experiences of using Active Implementation in Scotland, my thoughts are that:

• It is a long-term relationship that supports organisations to understand what needs to change and then guides them through the change process. For CELCIS' Protecting Children team, this means we will be working alongside colleagues in local areas for at least 3-4 years to support and implement their Addressing Neglect and Enhancing Wellbeing programmes.
• The emphasis is on implementation. Beginning with a thorough exploration of what needs to change and/or continue, Active Implementation's long-term relationship sees the work continue into the detailed planning and evaluation of the delivery to ensure the activities and approaches are implemented as intended. It also ensures sufficient infrastructure is in place to support change.
• It builds Active Implementation capacity within organisations, which can then be applied by organisations across other internal change efforts. By guiding staff through the different components of Active Implementation methodology, they themselves design, implement and oversee their own activities and approaches, as opposed to these being imposed on them by external experts.

Concluding Thoughts

Strategies, action plans, legislation, funding and training all have a place, but we also have to recognise the limitations of these approaches to change.

If we are serious about achieving transformational changes to our systems, such as ensuring that all children's needs are truly met in the right way at the right time so that we 'get it right for every child', then we must devote more time and effort into the 'how we do it' as opposed to the 'what we should do'.

Active Implementation provides the tools to do just that, which makes it a very exciting time to be part of CELCIS' Active Implementation journey.

The views expressed in this blog post are those of the author/s and may not represent the views or opinions of CELCIS or our funders.

Commenting on the blog posts

Sharing comments and perspectives prompted by the posts on this blog are welcome. CELCIS operates a moderation process so your comment will not go live straight away.

Please add a comment

Add Pingback

Authors